User talk:2601:803:402:17F4:347B:B447:63A5:79A5

Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted The author or authors here used a variety of primary and secondary sources. One of the biggest things that helps support this article is the fact that so many of Wollstonecraft's own works were present on her page. It shows not only her work as a professional, but as a mother. The primary sources are rightly from the 18th century and the secondary sources are varied and show many different views. The plethora of sources and the diversity within them attest to the page's authenticity. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? The citation links worked. Also there were lengthy additional readings sources at the bottom that all provided the reader with more information on the topic of Wollstonecraft. All quotes and paraphrasing are cited properly. Since this is simply a biographical page, there is a lot of information but the author cites everything well.

Courtney Spaulding Cls448 (talk) 16:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)