User talk:2601:80:C200:A472:485E:E3F:A0FC:4B46

Under scoring it says:

" If one judge chooses one boxer as the winner, the second judge chooses the other boxer, and the third judge calls it a draw, then the bout is ruled a Majority draw. The bout is also ruled a Split Draw if at least two out of three judges score the fight a draw, regardless of the third score. "

That contradicts this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majority_draw

"A majority draw is an outcome in several full-contact combat sports, including boxing, mixed martial arts (MMA), and others sports involving striking. In a majority draw, two of the three judges agree that neither fighter won (i.e. tied scorecards), while the third judge indicates one fighter being the clear winner on his/her scorecard.[1] Thus, the majority of judges see the outcome as even and the result is announced as such, although one judge gave a clear victory on his/her card to one fighter.

The outcome is one of the rarest judged decisions in professional boxing and MMA, apart from a unanimous draw (where all three judges score the fight as a tie), or a split draw (where a judge scores a winner of each fighter, as well as a judge scoring a draw). "

I am petty sure that when two judges call it a draw and the third calls it a win for one fighter or the other, it is called a majority draw, not split draw. Also if one just rules it a draw and another rules it a win for fighter A and the third judge rules it a win for fighter B, it is called a split draw and not a majority draw. Finally you said a bout is ruled a split draw if two judges called it a draw regardless of what the third judge says. That is not true. If all three judges call it a draw, it called a unanimous draw. I think you need to research this and get your facts straight.