User talk:2601:83:8080:23F0:CD4F:BB8A:D460:9E62

May 2021
Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 1998 Coimbatore bombings—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --allthefoxes (Talk) 12:36, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -  SUN EYE 1  03:19, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Vijay Sethupathi, you may be blocked from editing. -  SUN EYE 1  09:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Vijay Sethupathi. -  SUN EYE 1  14:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -  SUN EYE 1  14:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Vijay Sethupathi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -  SUN EYE 1  14:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vijay Sethupathi.   Robertjamal12   (talk)  16:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Stop adding your personal analysis
See WP:OR, the content you are adding in Vijay Sethupathi is a statement by the attacker + some of your opinions. It cannot be considered as a fact. -  SUN EYE 1  14:47, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok. Once Iam unblocked, I will just say, Vijay Sethupathi was attacked and I will cite the source.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -  SUN EYE 1  15:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)