User talk:2601:882:C100:5D30:90BF:DC71:CB6F:E3AA

September 2023
Hello, I'm Felida97. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Maggie De Block—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Felida97 (talk) 05:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * You're wrong they are constructive, Felida. 2601:882:C100:5D30:90BF:DC71:CB6F:E3AA (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm going to revert your reversion and if you revert that reversion I will simply revert that reversion to my reversion. 2601:882:C100:5D30:90BF:DC71:CB6F:E3AA (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maggie De Block. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. signed, 64andtim  ( chat ) 05:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Wrong! 2601:882:C100:5D30:90BF:DC71:CB6F:E3AA (talk) 05:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * These edits were constructive. I can show you if you would like 2601:882:C100:5D30:90BF:DC71:CB6F:E3AA (talk) 05:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)