User talk:2601:980:4000:9C0:2875:A155:368E:9DEC

January 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Black Heath, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 10:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)


 * See enslave. Unless that f**ker Gifford went out and made them slaves, he didn't enslave them. Adakiko (talk) 10:26, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 10:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bacon's Rebellion, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bacon's Rebellion was changed by 2601:980:4000:9C0:2875:A155:368E:9DEC (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874667 on 2023-01-28T10:40:44+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bacon's Rebellion. Nick Levine (talk) 10:52, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi 2601:980:4000:9C0:2875:A155:368E:9DEC! I noticed that you have made edits against the concerns of other users, after they had attempted to explain their concerns to you. I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable, and that making the same disputed change in multiple articles again and again is disruptive. You may be blocked from editing if you edit disruptively in this way.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)


 * yall are just being white supremacist but go on 2601:980:4000:9C0:2875:A155:368E:9DEC (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)