User talk:2601:98A:4202:FC30:2441:498C:43E6:E3B5

Entries for "incel" and "SJW"
To whom it may concern:

I do not imagine this comment will last long in today's social climate of cancel culture and censorship of "misinformation", but I nonetheless feel compelled to make a statement. For what it is worth, I had contributed to Wikipedia consistently for many years previously in the amounts that my income would allow, and had regarded the website very highly as a good source of information even when it was often looked down upon by others seeking more academic publications.

However, upon just now reading the Wikipedia entries for "incel" and "SJW" (social justice warrior), I am detecting a bias against those labeled as incels and a bias towards those labeled as SJW. It seems evident to me when I read words like "misogynist" in the first paragraph supposedly describing incels and a bunch of preponderance at the start of the SJW article drawing insisting that the label was originally intended to be a positive term until gamers gave it a negative connotation. In fact, I would argue that at least an equal portion of the credit for the term taking on a negative connotation belongs to the SJWs because of the actions they performed pursuing their agenda. When you place full condemnation on the gamers that resisted the agenda being pushed, it very much sounds like apologetics for the SJW crowd.

Please remember there are always two sides to a story, and if the author cannot write in an unbiased manner then that author should not write the entry. Just looking through the list of cited sources for each of these two entries gives a strong impression that a large percentage of the sources used for these entries are biased in the same manner as the Wikipedia entries themselves.

In any case, I am very disappointed in this apparent bias appearing in entries for such social labels, and I will not make any further donations until these types of entries are reviewed and the bias is removed.

Thank you