User talk:2601:C6:C300:31D:C1D8:D3D4:B949:B7D0

October 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 02:20, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Edited: long,long,long standing description shows reader the accurate description of the university esp. as to memberships, emphasis on teaching (included in its motto), etc. - as to what this institution is about; many research institutions don’t emphasis teaching as this does (as well as liberal art schools); updated Honors section w/ 2019 citation and language close to yours; Harvard & Columbia more relevant to reader than a figure; adjusted teaching for relevance and readability in keeping w/ your edit. I will be tied up, but glad to discuss or get an admin. Thanks 2601:C6:C300:31D:C1D8:D3D4:B949:B7D0 (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Feel free to open discussion in the article's Talk page. I recommend addressing each point or section of the article separately to keep the discussion organized. ElKevbo (talk) 02:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * OK most list Sea Grant, etc. - let me know the difficulty. See other comments2601:C6:C300:31D:C1D8:D3D4:B949:B7D0 (talk) 02:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm just beginning to remove sea- and space-grant from the infoboxes and ledes of articles. They're relatively minor designations that aren't nearly as impactful as land-grant status.  The onus is on anyone who believes otherwise as there is a ton of literature about the massive impact of the different land-grant acts especially their role in shaping curricula and mission (and hence structure and funding) at those institutions.  I don't know of any similar literature or arguments for the other -grant designations; they're really just ongoing research collaborations that seem to only impact a small number of faculty, staff, and students in related disciplines.  They definitely should be included in the articles, likely in the history sections and academics or research section, but we simply can't make the claim that these designations are essential defining characteristics of the institutions that must be included in the infobox or lede. ElKevbo (talk) 02:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * As I hear, saw on TV, and read, UofGa is very wed to its grants, spends mucho$$$ on its ships, housing, research, space weather (heard was on TV), production of small satellites, etc. Would think it mistake to remove from Uni’s that use & emphasis these grants as a very big part of research & teaching as UofGa. If need let’s talk more tomorrow. 2601:C6:C300:31D:C1D8:D3D4:B949:B7D0 (talk) 03:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)