User talk:2602:304:CF0A:9080:2C64:2413:65CF:70A0

This is a fantastic article! I find it to be very useful and generally easy to read. However, I did notice that your 'base words' and 'root word' links don't lead to a productive page despite the fact that your See Also section does have a successful link for 'word root', so you may want to fix that. I also think you may want to add a citation or some sort of reference for your section on productivity. I don't doubt the validity of the data in there, but it doesn't say how you came to the conclusion that said affixes were more or less productive than one another. Cheers to a great start on your article. Stee4257 (talk) 20:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)