User talk:2602:306:25EC:94B9:14D:3A8D:EA1F:3024

January 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Clemson Tigers football, you may be blocked from editing. Boomer VialHolla 07:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Boomer Vial, I have actually been the one trying to come up with a compromise and re-notate everything properly. Both of those IP addresses, at least one I see, are to public terminals, and have been linked to edit warring on these pages in the past. In researching, an undefeated regular season is not synonymous with "perfect season" unless specified.  I am also removing the claimed national title code until sources are added.  However, the finalist category makes more sense here.  All my edits are good faith. 2602:306:25EC:94B9:14D:3A8D:EA1F:3024 (talk) 08:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Continually adding "perfect season" (when 14 - 1 is not a perfect season), and changing the Tigers record is not good-faith edits. Especially when your edits were reverted more than once, and I had to just revert your edit yet again. Boomer VialHolla 08:55, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What are you doing? I am the one who has been trying to fix the problem.  I never stated anything was a perfect season, nor did I change the record of anything.  You need to go back and read the details of what you have been changing, which is why an editor detailed it, or contribute by helping to fix it the correct way, since other editors have already attempted to get it right without knowing how to fix page code.  And the University of South Carolina to my knowledge is not even in the Atlantic Division of that conference. Again, in good faith. 2602:306:25EC:94B9:14D:3A8D:EA1F:3024 (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, you didn't? This|this says otherwise. Oh, and thanks for removing my edits to the 2012 divisional playoff game, which I took the time to look up, and gather information on. Feel free to check the Wikipedia article on that season|season if you don't believe me. It's all right there in plain English. Please, just stop. Boomer VialHolla 10:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Redacting the above struck-out comment. It was incorrect, thank for letting me know. I've changed it to reflect (hopefully) the right information. I still stand by my revert of your edits though, as going 14 - 1 is not considered a undefeated season. Boomer VialHolla 10:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Why are you edit warring with the person who is trying to stop the edit-warring? Clemson was not in the 2012 ACC Championship game, which is notated under the divisional championship infobox.  The divison championship was split into co-champions with FSU who played in that game.  It's double asterixed underneath.  I appreciate you looking it up, but neither team you listed is even in the ACC.  I also asterixed the "undefeated regular season" to re-notate the difference.  A "perfect season" is one which is undefeated and untied: 1900, 1948, 1981.  Lastly, the finalist code is correct.  I removed the claimed one until it is sourced.  Don't just simply revert an entire edit because you got one detail incorrect.  It takes too much time away from editors who are getting it correct.  I am trying to help you.  2602:306:25EC:94B9:14D:3A8D:EA1F:3024 (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I see your redact now, thank you. But there was never anything wrong with the division championship box. I was also trying to tell you that the others were just here to vandalize the page being from a rival fanbase. They were not here to contrbute.  The information that I had there is correct. 2602:306:25EC:94B9:14D:3A8D:EA1F:3024 (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixing it again. Just so you and I are on the same page, it says "regular seasons" twice now. 2602:306:25EC:94B9:14D:3A8D:EA1F:3024 (talk) 11:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Oops, I'm so sorry about reverting your edits, just now. My page jumped when I went to click 'edit'. I also see what you were saying now. They were undefeated in the regular season, and also you were reverting vandalism. I'm so thick that I just realized it. I'm sorry about reverting your edits, and the attitude I gave you while you were trying to explain your edits. They were completely justified. Boomer VialHolla 12:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)