User talk:2602:306:381E:5630:356A:B32:7680:BC15

September 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Conjuring 2. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. ''There is an active discussion to gain consesus to your change and/or to re-write that section. Please participate there. The stable version of the article had second which is why I undid your edit again.'' -- Dane 2007  talk 23:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Bobby Moynihan does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!  Aloha27   talk  00:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Macaddct1984. An edit you recently made to Bram Stoker's Dracula seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 00:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. Your recent edit to Next (2007 film) appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jyn Erso, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karunamon  ✉  23:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on T'Pol. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2602:306:381E:5630:356A:B32:7680:BC15) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! TPM 18:16, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that your recent editing on Taboo (2017 TV series) has been undone. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is othing wrong in having the two directors as redlinks ... it is deliberate. Cheers! — Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; 08:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taboo (2017 TV series), you may be blocked from editing. — Gareth Griffith-Jones &#124; The Welsh &#124; Buzzard &#124; 19:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences
Sorry, the only edit I meant to revert was when you unlinked. Sometimes Twinkle does some weird stuff. Morphdog (t - c) 03:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Please explain
When you make a change, please use the Edit Summary to explain your changes. dldnh (talk) 21:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Pirates of the Caribbean
Hello,

I've noticed that you've made several edits to Henry on the Pirates of the Caribbean-related pages. If you have a reliable source for these changes, I would appreciate you adding it here so that all interested editors can see the source.

Thanks, Michelangelo1992 (talk) 18:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Mlpearc Phone. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Template:The Rolling Stones. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Mlpearc Phone ( open channel ) 01:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:REDLINKS. Please revert your change to Template:The Rolling Stones, thank you,  Mlpearc Phone  ( open channel ) 02:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Mlpearc Phone  ( open channel ) 02:11, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Spotnitz, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite  The '45  13:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2017). Jdcomix (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bryan Fuller. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 03:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

May 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Roger Deakins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Tonight Show have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dhtwiki (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A Clockwork Orange (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  The Old Jacobite  The '45  23:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. ''You have removed a tag on Jurrasic Park That is supposed to be kept. please do not remove tags again.'' Thewinrat (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.