User talk:2602:FE43:1:4752:501E:63C7:C929:910

False Accusation
that's rather convenient, isn't it? If you really think I'm evading a block, you have my permission to the link the supposed accounts to this IP range. There aren't any though, as you well know. Checkuser abuse indeed, like your buddy Bbb23. Just because someone knows about Wikipedia and the history of some of its abusive moderators, doesn't mean that person ever had a Wikipedia account or is evading a valid block. Unless you can provide verifiable evidence of block evasion, I will consider the current block on this IP range to be invalid and continue editing from other ip ranges. 2602:FE43:1:4752:501E:63C7:C929:910 (talk) 02:32, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You are free to contest your block. You are absolutely not free to evade this block. --Yamla (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Ignoring an invalid block is not evasion. Otherwise anyone using a recycled IP address used by someone else who got blocked would be evading a block. 2602:FE43:1:4752:501E:63C7:C929:910 (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
 * You personally are not free to evade this block. I will not respond further. If you disagree with the block, contest it. I will not respond further. --Yamla (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)