User talk:2603:3001:C00:2400:C8DF:1A25:93C:ADBD

Fringe
Please read wP:npov and wp:fringe as well as wp:rs.Slatersteven (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Already read. My edits are consistent with that. Heavy-handed reversion is not. 2603:3001:C00:2400:C8DF:1A25:93C:ADBD (talk) 17:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No they are not, we go with what experts say, not fringe sources.Slatersteven (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It is a factual claim that most scientists call YEC pseudoscience, as the edit says. It is also factual that CMI rejects things like flat earth and anti-vaxxism, and factual that these are regarded as pseduoscience, as per the edit.

And read wp:editwar.Slatersteven (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Edit wars would be reduced by less heavy-handed reversion as opposed to working out what satisfies the rules.
 * Which is not a jusfitcation for edit warring.Slatersteven (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * OK.
 * So revert back and follow wp:brd, and make a case at talk.Slatersteven (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * OK then, it says:
 * The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus. This process is not mandated by Wikipedia policy, …
 * Bold editing is a fundamental principle of Wikipedia. All editors are welcome to make positive contributions. It's how new information is added to Wikipedia. When in doubt, edit! …
 * Consider reverting only when necessary. 2603:3001:C00:2400:C8DF:1A25:93C:ADBD (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * And you can still get a block for wp:tendentious editing if you ignore it too often.Slatersteven (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

And read wp:spa.Slatersteven (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)