User talk:2603:300C:1201:CA00:950E:21E5:1DCE:460F

December 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nicole Camphaug have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nicole Camphaug was changed by 2603:300C:1201:CA00:950E:21E5:1DCE:460F (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898847 on 2021-12-28T21:02:50+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nicole Camphaug. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Helen (💬📖) 21:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism
Vandalizing articles is not how you get a WP:POINT across. Take it to the talk page or you’re getting reported and most likely blocked as WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. Additionally your complaint is rather weak and prejudiced as the article was written by a respected editor and admin using reliable sources, not by some drive-by PR account. WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn’t a reason to delete something. Dronebogus (talk) 21:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

WP:GREATWRONGS
If you have some ethical objection to sealskin you don’t have to prove it by vandalizing Wikipedia. If you just don’t like it for no particular reason then we’ve been over this. Dronebogus (talk) 23:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)