User talk:2603:3020:2A54:8100:99F9:8BF0:FFE2:3ADF

''Result: User:W sideman is warned. They may be blocked if they revert the article again unless they have received a prior consensus for their change on the article talk page. They have added "Honor and brotherly love' as the fraternity's motto seven times since mid-January. Others have reverted their change, saying that such a wording for the motto is unsourced and is not to be found in Baird's Manual. EdJohnston (talk) 04:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)''


 * The best part of this is that, through all the sockpuppet and IP edits, you've increased the number of people watching the Klete Keller page to over 40 - ensuring that, even if I quit editing tomorrow, your POV edits to the lead will never, ever survive the added scrutiny that you've drawn to yourself. Thank you for that. It's a good feeling. W sideman (talk) 14:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * that response just proves you should not be on wikipedia, your left leaning agenda aligns with the admins and thats why you are protected. I'm just trying to right an obvious wrong. guess you forgot there's already 2 other veteran editors that don't agree with your POV. You violate WP:TENDENTIOUS  on a regular basis. Eventually your vandalism will be corrected. I'm not in a rush.
 * you know what gave me a "good feeling" & a nice chuckle.. this ROFL -

W Sideman has no life and sits at the computer making edits to Wikipedia pages for no reason. Wes wishes he had a life or a partner but instead lives through some weird life where they feel important by making changes to Wikipedia articles. Must be a truly sad life to sit behind a computer and make edits all day and not even earn a penny doing it. It’s truly sad. Some would say life isn’t worth existing for people like this. Wes should discontinue. Wes should be stopped. Wesley needs therapeutic assistance and a diet plan. Wesley. I’m here to stay. They’re coming Wes. They’re coming. ChrisPontius41 (talk) 17:25, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

wesley

 * @Ws sideman: You need to stop now. When you point a finger at another, you point four at yourself. --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ws sideman: IP editor, it looks like the beginning of an edit war. It is time to open a discussion on the talk page of the article rather than to continue the edit war.. Constant314 (talk) 22:41, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deepfriedokra&diff=next&oldid=1120943837
 * fyi he has disrupted alot more since my small issue - he violates WP:TENDENTIOUS every day, it's a pattern. amazing how even admins that had problems with him are protecting him now.. unreal.
 * Result: User:Ws sideman is warned. They may be blocked if they revert the article again unless they have received a prior consensus for their change on the article talk page. They have added "Honor and brotherly love' as the fraternity's motto seven times since mid-January. Others have reverted their change, saying that such a wording for the motto is unsourced and is not to be found in Baird's Manual. EdJohnston (talk) 04:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1127118280#Quick_AE_question
 * 73.46.238.152 (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe you should file an ANI report? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * well someone needs to be a whistleblower - this isn't about me. unfortunately due to the unfair and complicated system in which wikipedia operates, this is the only way I know of, unless you can help..  All I was trying to do was correct an obvious wrong, and 2 experienced editors agree. Wesley never gained consensus, and now I'm finding out this is a disturbing pattern in his edits going back to 2020.
 * He has been reprimanded by multiple admins in the past 3 years but nobody is putting it together. He gives a quick apology, then moves on to his next victim.
 * tendentious example 1 from 2021: Ws sideman, I have once again reverted your attempts to add these allegations. You have already been informed that TMZ is not an acceptable WP:RS for salacious allegations of criminal activity. Your "I didn't hear that" attempt to re-add this is verging on tendentious editing. Please do not attempt to add anything to this section again. Thank you in advance. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Eggishorn Is cheatsheet.com a reliable source? Ws sideman (talk) 18:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[ reply]
 * NO. How do I make this clear? You have demonstrated that you are determined to insert information that multiple experienced editors, including an administrator, have told you is not allowed by policy. You should not be trying to find an acceptable source for this information to justify its inclusion. You should be leaving the article alone for the time being. Pursuing this course of action is likely to end in frustration or worse. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard/Archive323#Chad_Johnson_(television_personality)
 * tendentious example 2 from may 2022:
 * Per what I've posted here: scroll down one after this link  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive452#User:Moxy_reported_by_User:Wisefroggy_(Result:_Not_blocked;_talk_page_discussion_recommended) This user has been extremely toxic and engaging in an ongoing edit war since the end of 2020 with another user. He has refused to gain consensus on the talk page of the article in question: Talk:Execution of Nathaniel Woods. I tried to seek a middle ground between both users and he resorted to continuing to revert the article as well as modifying other articles that I used as examples to suit his argument, as seen here: [153 ] and here: [154 ].
 * Why he is making such a big deal over the word "drug" and "crack" is beyond me. I was merely trying to gain WP:Consensus which he refused to participate in and merely changed the article wording again, as he has done since end of 2020, to suit his agenda. I listed examples in the edit warring report I made that shows he has been engaging in a long term edit war since the end of 2020 with TheXuitts. Inexpiable (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 * More examples of his ongoing edit war, and this is with another user, not myself:  Original revision: [155 ]. First time Wesley changed it: [156 ].
 * More examples of him reverting it here over the past few years and months: [157 ], [158 ] [159 ], [160 ]. The examples are from end of 2020, 2021, March 2022, and yesterday. Inexpiable (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 * exhibit 3:  @CycloneYoris, @Ws sideman Greetings. I approved the IP as a pending change reviewer. As I understand my roll, it is to stop vandalism, obvious edit warring, and other obvious non-constructive editing. The edit did not appear to me to be any of those, so I approved it. When it came up again, I felt like the IP editor had a point that it was better to mention the specific single felony conviction rather than the vague "convicted felon".  When you hover over a blue-link, pretty much all you get is the intro. I think it better serves the reader to be specific in the intro in this case. I don't plan to be otherwise involved. I hope you will consider my opinion. Constant314 (talk) 20:19, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
 * exhibit 4: This being said, as far as the lead sentence, it seems pretty clear to me that it should mention that he is a swimmer first, then that he committed a crime. SecretName101 (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * exhibit 5: Noting that it looks like Defeedme was restoring status quo ante. Ws sideman needs to justify the proposed changes. Both need to stop and take it to WP:BLPN or WP:DRN -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:29, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It's a minor edit to the lead, correcting ERRORS and order of importance in his life. which is more in line with other Olympic Gold Medalists. Not sure why this is such a big issue for this person ws sideman.. Klete Kellers swimming career and medalling in 3 World Olympic Games far outweighs the Jan 6 local disruption, this is a fact, not opinion. Defeedme (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * personal attack 1: @Ws sideman: I have no opinion on the merits of your accusation, but if you believe you have sufficient evidence, you should reopen Sockpuppet investigations/DrAcHeNWiNgZz (Inexpiable's previous username). Otherwise, you need to cease accusing Inexpiable of socking because it constitutes a personal attack.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * personal attack 2:  By the way, Ws sideman - please don't ask people to reveal their identity, even if they are blocked. I recognise that you qualified it with 'you don't have to answer', but generally speaking, just don't do it. Even if they said they were a particular person, we can't establish the veracity of any such claim here. If it needs to be established (which is not necessary here), that's done through WP:VRT. Cheers Girth Summit (blether) 20:16, 1 February 2023
 * personal attack 3: I respect SecretName101's take on the lead sentence because they did a lot of work on the article. I disagree with that take, but no need to rehash that here. I think the situation with Defeedme has been resolved and I look at that as a positive. Ws sideman (talk) 17:56, 14 November 2022
 * personal attack 4:  The best part of this is that, through all the sockpuppet and IP edits, you've increased the number of people watching the Klete Keller page to over 40 - ensuring that, even if I quit editing tomorrow, your POV edits to the lead will never, ever survive the added scrutiny that you've drawn to yourself. Thank you for that. It's a good feeling. Ws sideman
 * and there's more..  all of the above shows a determined pattern of WP:TENDENTIOUS behavior that hasn't stopped - and he's doing it in such a devious way that somehow all the admins can't see, even the ones that had issues with him in the past. I don't know exactly why he's being "protected" but I have my own opinions on that. thanks for your attention to this matter.

2603:3020:2A54:8100:99F9:8BF0:FFE2:3ADF (talk) 21:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)