User talk:2603:6010:8A00:3AA4:8C61:6100:C729:447D

Right, which is an ethics violation. You're just splitting hairs. The article also says that he was fired not "released". Why not change it to say that instead of reverting back to the sugar coated version? Why are democrat candidates getting special treatment?
 * Nobody's getting special treatment. The 2nd edit is fine. You have to say what the source says, I don't see "ethics" violation there. A social media politics violation isn't unethical, it's just a corporate policy. Unless the source calls it ethics, ethics violation has a specific meaning in the world of politics. Usually implies accepting bribes. Andre🚐 20:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)