User talk:2603:6011:6205:B7AF:29F6:6C16:D101:33E2

May 2024
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Harrison Butker. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Do not add words to direct quotations that are not present in the actual quotation. —C.Fred (talk) 04:26, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * It is well within Wikipedia's rules to not use opinion injection, and prevent the assumption of bias.
 * The source claims to speak for all americans.
 * So the quote either needs removed for biased language of show a correct view from the persons opinion, in this case, a far left so called "activist" 2603:6011:6205:B7AF:29F6:6C16:D101:33E2 (talk) 04:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Discuss on the talk page what framing you think needs to go around the quotes, but don't put words into another person's mouth. —C.Fred (talk) 04:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Fair enough 2603:6011:6205:B7AF:29F6:6C16:D101:33E2 (talk) 04:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @2603:6011:6205:B7AF:29F6:6C16:D101:33E2
 * If the quotation should be removed, do that. It may be reverted back, however. NEVER add your words to a quotation. That is dishonest and diminishes your credibility. This applies to anything, whether the quotation is right or wrong. Even if you you disagree with the statement, you have to be fair and balanced. Thank you,
 * TanRabbitry (talk) 04:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Harrison Butker, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 04:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @2603:6011:6205:B7AF:29F6:6C16:D101:33E2
 * Don't use vulgar and obscene language. If you don't like how Wikipedia is, why don't you try to improve it, instead of giving up? If you are polite and neutral, you can correct biases that you obviously believe are present. Why not try doing that, in accordance with the rules?
 * TanRabbitry (talk) 04:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

04:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)