User talk:2603:7000:2101:AA00:39EA:17E1:B3CF:1813

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Appeal
Hello User:HJ Mitchell. I'm sorry if I've been seen as creating vandalism. I don't understand how that is the case. I believe I've been only adding text with refs, sometimes more than one. Please let me know if I have done otherwise, where that may be. I would like to understand the problem, and apologize if I made an error, and request a block lift.

There was an instance of an add not being accepted, where I believe I was using the Telegraph as a ref, and I made an effort to report the issue, per the screen that popped up.


 * 19:18, 17 November 2023 diff hist +1,086‎ Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports ‎ →‎2603:7000:2101:AA00:39EA:17E1:B3CF:1813 : new section current


 * 19:17, 17 November 2023 diff hist +1,094‎ Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports ‎ →‎2603:7000:2101:AA00:39EA:17E1:B3CF:1813 : new section

2603:7000:2101:AA00:39EA:17E1:B3CF:1813 (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It's possible I misread the filter results. I've unblocked to be safe. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 19:36, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. And thanks for your excellent work. I've seen you around. A quick question. I was once blocked, and was unable to dispute it fully - I thought it was an improper block -- beyond another admin who edits a lot with the blocking admin, and simply ignored my explanation as to why the block was not proper and without addressing it confirmed the block. Is there a way to have you look at that? I would not want to have the prior block, which I thought improper, part of my record. It was made by an editor who was restoring uncited material without any refs whatsoever (on a subject matter he said he was steering clear of), which I thought was not in keeping with wp:burden .. and when I voiced my view he blocked me. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:39EA:17E1:B3CF:1813 (talk) 19:41, 17 November 2023 (UTC)