User talk:2603:7000:2101:AA00:49C4:B839:790A:579E

December 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Remi Kanazi, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. QuantumRealm  (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 10:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


 * user:QuantumRealm - you’ve made a series of inappropriate reverts. First of all, you left no edit summary explaining the rationale for your reverts. That is not proper. Second, you reverted completely appropriate edits.2603:7000:2101:AA00:49C4:B839:790A:579E (talk) 11:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! QuantumRealm  (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 10:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Don't add unnecessary red links
Refer to WP:REDLINKS. The book isn't notable.

And your previous edits weren't helpful either. Quantum<sup style="color:#333">Realm  (<b style="color:#609">meow🦁</b> • <b style="color:#F63">pawtrack🐾</b>) 11:14, 12 December 2023 (UTC)


 * No. That’s certainly not the case.

His notability is due to his writings, primarily. He is deemed notable. Therefore the red links are proper.

“In general, a red link should remain in an article if there is a reasonable expectation that the article in question will eventually be created (either as its own article or as a redirect); remove red links if and only if Wikipedia should not have any coverage on the subject.”

As the WP rule states.

It also states: “ In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there is no existing candidate article, or article section, under any name.”

Plus - there is no such thing as a “necessary” red link.

I can’t imagine how you can think that there is not such a reasonable expectation. I disagree strongly with you on that. Kindly, reconsider, and Self-revert.--2603:7000:2101:AA00:49C4:B839:790A:579E (talk) 11:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)