User talk:2603:7000:3600:B50:FC15:8E29:5640:CFA9

May 2021
Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religious male circumcision without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Religious male circumcision, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GenoV84 (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)