User talk:2603:7000:7002:8D10:74AD:7F3E:514C:593E

October 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nicole Malliotakis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nicole Malliotakis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 09:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nicole Malliotakis, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 09:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nicole Malliotakis. Tommi1986 let's talk! 09:56, 7 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The New York Times is not a "bad source". Adakiko (talk) 09:57, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ged UK  10:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)