User talk:2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567

March 2023
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Richard Wagner. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. – Popo   Dameron   talk  00:14, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Richard Wagner, you may be blocked from editing. Jguglielmin (talk) 00:25, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Richard Wagner. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 00:31, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I gave a valid reason. I don't understand ? 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 00:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Simply because you are not personally interested in well-sourced content directly pertaining to the subject of an article does not mean that it can be removed without prior discussion. Jguglielmin (talk) 00:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but it doesn't make sense to me. Anyway, can you please just give me the song? I had it the other day. Maybe it was Mahler? But anyway, the subject of the article is Richard Wagner and the content of the section is journalists masturbating.. Really? 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 00:43, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I'm not entirely sure what you mean by 'giving you the song'. If you're looking for the title, after doing some poking around I found Also sprach Zarathustra, composed by Richard Strauss, which is the song used in the opening sequence. In terms of your content removal, controversy surrounding Richard Wagner (well-supported by sources) is entirely appropriate for an article which is about Richard Wagner. Jguglielmin (talk) 00:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! That was what I was looking for. Putting a gossip column in the wikipedia article of a dead composer still doesn't make sense to me but I got what I was looking for and thank you again. 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Glad I was able to help. Jguglielmin (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 01:01, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * sorry it made the eyes disappear, that was a smile 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I fixed it. Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 01:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you Lili! 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you Lili! 2603:7000:8E01:2B47:45A5:FD3B:46D3:F567 (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)