User talk:2603:7001:CF40:A38E:C830:60E2:EDCA:56AC

Edit warring at Election denial movement in the United States
Your recent editing history at Election denial movement in the United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 06:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)


 * My edits were based on content that is both factual and verifiable regarding the election denial incidents and perpetrators who predated Donald J. Trump by more than a decade, in some instances, including by members of the Democrat party. Your refusal to allow this factual content demonstrates your bias, as this entry/article in its current form reads like a propaganda piece targeting Donald Trump. You do your readers a disservice and present DISinformation--the worst kind of all. 2603:7001:CF40:A38E:C830:60E2:EDCA:56AC (talk) 07:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I support the inclusion of something along the lines of your addition, but your current version will never be accepted. It needs to be radically revised and backed by more reliable sources.
 * Slow down and always assume good faith (AGF). Do not accuse. Do not use lots of bold or any ALLCAPS. We operate quite differently than you may expect. Any content that is questioned can be reverted by another editor if they have policy-based reasons for doing so. (See WP:PAG). There can be many reasons for objections, including the wording, the sources, the formatting, etc. Your addition is problematic on several fronts, so it should be discussed and workshopped on the talk page before inclusion. There you should civilly and calmly discuss how to improve that content. If you are confrontational, you will be shot down, may get blocked, and will not succeed. Convince other editors it should be included. Stay calm and be patient and kind. There is no rush. Ask for help to improve it so that all objections are met. Remain subservient and learn. You are the newbie, and other editors have much more experience. If you will allow it, they will help you.
 * BTW, if you want to be taken seriously here, register a user profile. (I seriously discourage using your real name.) Editors are suspicious of IP editors as most vandalism is committed by them. As a registered user, you will have better security, have more tools available to you, and can be emailed and pinged. There are a whole lot of advantages and no disadvantages. -- Valjean (talk) ( PING me ) 18:40, 11 January 2024 (UTC)