User talk:2603:8000:E202:C8A2:4C9C:29B7:C796:B18E

October 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Frances Haugen, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''The added information from a primary source about the subject appears WP:UNDUE, particularly in how it was placed so prominently in the article, above the information from secondary sources about her testimony and communication with bipartisan members of Congress; please also review WP:PROPORTION, e.g. An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects of its subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight proportional to its treatment in the body of reliable, published material on the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news. Thank you,'' Beccaynr (talk) 18:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)