User talk:2603:8001:1C00:A962:F431:F09C:53D:943B

June 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wang (surname), you may be blocked from editing. ''For the third time, don't add non-notable names. See WP:WTAF. Using multiple IPs does not change anything.'' Meters (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wang (surname). Stop adding this non-notable name. Meters (talk) 02:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Wang (surname) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 02:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * So, why did you bother posting about this to the TeaHouse if you were only going to ignore the explanation and make the edit again? You have now broken WP:3RR. Please self-revert before you are blocked. Meters (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Wang (surname)) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 03:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)