User talk:2603:800C:1800:7C00:E99B:867C:60D:3ED9

Section of the article seems to be voicing an opinion
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't this portion of the article within the background section sound too much like it's voicing a personal opinion rather than keeping a neutral point of view?

"Professor Soh's book, The Comfort Women,[1] which has been referenced to detail the nature of Kim Soon-duk's forced captivity and sexual slavery engages in a dubious amount of historiographical engagement. This is made particularly evident because none of the postwar historiography of the comfort women were ever conducted by Soh herself, and instead she chose to interview only other activists and historians.[5] She demonstrates somewhat irresponsible scholarship and negligence as well, which is indicated by the historical inaccuracies of her argument, such as leaving behind inconsistent legal interpretations of international war crimes, as well as names of certain universities.[5] For this reason, Professor Soh's detail of Kim Soon-duk as wanting to reunite with Izumi is disrespectful to the legacy left behind by Kim Soon-duk, and Kim Soon-duk's own efforts to organize around a formal apology from the Japanese government and reparations for these heinous war crimes."