User talk:2603:8080:B205:EA12:5972:DDF:4EE3:4BC6

February 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Butch Cassidy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Butch Cassidy was changed by 2603:8080:B205:EA12:5972:DDF:4EE3:4BC6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867539 on 2021-02-03T01:33:40+00:00

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Butch Cassidy. Please stop reverting it's may block from editing.

Thank you. RoseCloud26 (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Apparently ClueBotNG and you BOTH have difficulty distinguishing an edit from vandalism.
 * Wouldn't be the first time. RoseCloud26, please look more carefully, MUCH more carefully, before you revert. And when you do, explain what you were doing. And when you run off to ANI immediately, have the decency to notify the editor. But don't run to ANI for this. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Re your question about Allan Case
You asked, "Instead of removing citations, wouldn't it be better to mark them as "better citation needed"?" If the citations were merely questionable, I probably would say "yes". When the source is considered invalid, however, I think it is better to remove it. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)