User talk:2603:8080:F600:27A2:A124:2A92:B4D:65E2

Vouching for Zipupyourcuunt
I don't currently have any desire to talk to you about my suspension, that may change. I would like it to change, and I'm willing to talk to you late in this year or in April 2023 when my head is more clear, but being labeled a black supremacist super soldier in a "Polite" investigation post by you ain't helping.

Part of the reason I'm struggling to respect you and all the other folk that hounded me, then told me in a 3 page essay "I know it LOOKS like we're ganging up on you but we're NOT" (Before I even acccused you of that, weird) is that in your act of catching me out, you appear to have blocked 2 extra IP ranges and one extra user that aren't even in my location, simply because they expressed similar opinions as me. Saying there's a minimal chance that he's not me (?). Similarly to how after my first few edits I was immediately labeled a sockpuppet of Desertambition simply because I expressed similar opinions as him, and nickled and dimed by admins over minor and imagined infractions for the rest of my stay. Not a coincidence that all of our viewpoints are centered around African and African descended people.

I don't understand how you linked the Alice Sebold incident and the Killing of Trayvon Martin to the 1804 Haiti massacre, though. The first was merely a woman who identified the incorrect (Innocent) man as a suspect for a rape. The second was a hispanic man who killed a black teenager and went on celebrating it after court. The third was the mass murder of french people in direct response to a couple decades of slavery by the enslaved. Why assume we're all the same when they all jumped on a different subject matter?

In doing that, you've convinced Zippy that you insta blocked him merely for trying to clean up what he percieved as mandigo propoganda stuff plastered on the Haiti page. I did not make an extra account. I'm sure you have a tool to confirm all accounts and IPs I have and decided not to use it just cuz, or waited until you had a convenient excuse to do what you should have done the second you found out. Unless they forgive that, or unless another admin clears the mess up to them, I doubt any future edits from them will brimm with the same passion you claimed I had. If you let them back in, stop hounding people over meaningless shit just because you disagree with them, please. It's terribly mind numbing, and it's clear you people live in glass houses. I can't collaborate with or help any of you if there's always some rule to justify your disagreements with cited viewpoints relevant to an article expressed in a user talk page of all things. 2603:8080:F600:27A2:A124:2A92:B4D:65E2 (talk) 23:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You are welcome to appeal your block on your original account. "Zippy" is welcome to appeal their block through UTRS. I'm not going to get into techniques used to identify sockpuppets, other than to say I only placed two blocks related to the June Parker SPI: this IP range's and "Zippy's". And this isn't about ideology. I enforce our sockpuppetry policy against liberals, conservatives, and everyone else. (I'm far more often accused of bias in the opposite direction, for what it's worth.) --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 23:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)