User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:3166:9FF3:94CB:7052

June 2018
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Nick Blackman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * They were sourced. If you are referring to the references in the lede, they are sourced in the body. That is fine. "Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Leads are usually written at a greater level of generality than the body, and information in the lead section of non-controversial subjects is less likely to be challenged and less likely to require a source... The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article."

You reverted without an edit summary. Using tools. Deleting losts of RS refs, and text it supported. That is not right. Please be an example to others, and be more careful. Also - open your talk page to IPs if you are going to revert them - especially using tools -- especially since you make errors -- and since you leave IPs a note that says "if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page". 2604:2000:E010:1100:C1B5:1345:E4D7:5A24 (talk) 16:43, 8 July 2018 (UTC)