User talk:2604:2000:E016:A700:4484:D7B0:8756:2C26

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on 2016 Manhattan bombing. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2604:2000:E016:A700:4484:D7B0:8756:2C26) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 21:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220  of  Borg 03:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amos Gilad has been accepted
 Amos Gilad, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  02:46, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Amos_Gilad help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Sorry
Sorry about that, try to provide a more detailed edit summary. And I would suggest creating an account. Ps We are humans, out of the 100s of edits I rollback, I make mistakes. Thanks Copernicus The Vigilante — User:CopernicusAD or my talk User talk: CopernicusAD :D 19:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. But in addition to you not leaving a proper edit summary, the reverts were completely unacceptable. They could even be considered vandalism. You gave no explanation for that. Your level of understanding seems low -- based on the discussion on your talk page. The issue here is not that I am an IP, but that you made completely inappropriate reverts. That sort of behavior hurts WP. Because it hurts the morale of editors making correct edits. It is not acceptable. We have to be vigilant not to do it. It is not excused by you making other correct edits. You are not blocked on the percentage of how may improper edits you make. But how may improper edits you make, without proper explanation. If you do not understand the rules completely, or are moving too fast to avoid these mistakes, slow down. Your diverting the discussion to the fact that I am an IP is irrelevant -- this has nothing to do with whether I am an IP. IPs are human too. Please. 2604:2000:E016:A700:4484:D7B0:8756:2C26 (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Kondavarsha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atlanta Braves minor league players have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kondavarsha (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * It was entirely constructive, and supported by proper refs. What for goodness sake do you imagine is not constructive? 2604:2000:E016:A700:4484:D7B0:8756:2C26 (talk) 18:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry. It was mistake. Seeing the "rookie level" part, I assumed it was a vandal edit. Please excuse me. Sorry again!

Talkback
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 01:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garen Bloch has been accepted
 Garen Bloch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 13:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.