User talk:2604:2000:F20E:2800:7135:8C2:C554:2169

February 2016
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Antoine Lahad ‎, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Opdire657 (talk) 04:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add defamatory content, as you did at Antoine Lahad ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Opdire657 (talk) 04:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Eilabun massacre. Opdire657 (talk) 04:32, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Category:Antisemitism in Sweden, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wywyit (talk) 04:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  11:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tanbircdq (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Discretionary sanctions notice
Tanbircdq (talk) 12:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In addition, as a result of a recent ruling, all anonymous IP editors and accounts with less than 500 edits and 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. RolandR (talk) 14:54, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement
I have started a discussion on Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement concerning you.--Opdire657 (talk) 14:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

At least five hundred edits and at least thirty days
Hi. I see that you are participating in articles that concern the Israel-Palestine conflict. There was a rule passed in November of last year that says that everyone who edits that subject must have at least thirty days' experience and at least five hundred edits and may not do so anonymously: Here

If this was a good-faith mistake (you didn't know about the rule), then you should establish a non-anonymous account and take at least a month to build your reputation on Wikipedia through productive edits in lower-stakes parts of the project. This isn't a formality. It helps new users learn the ropes and rules in places where the consequences for accidentally breaking them aren't as dire. I can see from the "February" thread on this talk page that you probably do not know what is expected of you. Good luck. Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:49, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Blocked per Arbitration Enforcement
To enforce an arbitration decision and per WP:ARBPIA3, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 21:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."