User talk:2604:2B40:214D:15:15D1:8E71:1D86:8490

April 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Terrance Yeakey, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle 🏳‍🌈 17:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Isabelle. I appreciate your censorship. This is my first time contributing to Wikipedia and it will be my last. I believe your quick censorship has political undertones. I am saddened that you are censoring access to information, but honestly not surprised. 2604:2B40:214D:15:15D1:8E71:1D86:8490 (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added a reference. I hope this will stop your attempts to censor access to both sides of the story. Not just the official side. 2604:2B40:214D:15:15D1:8E71:1D86:8490 (talk) 17:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This is an encyclopedia, not a conspiracy website. If you continue to add poorly-sourced material to any article, or cast aspersions against editors who are upholding Wikipedia's policies regarding verifiability and sourcing, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't have to agree with our policies, but you need to follow them. If you continue to restore the content, you will be blocked from editing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You will be exposed for your leftist bias Jezebel Ponyo. You are eroding trust in Wikipedia. 2604:2B40:214D:15:15D1:8E71:1D86:8490 (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Last warning
knock it off. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring loony conspiracy theory into an article, after clear warnings. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.