User talk:2604:3D08:2C82:5D00:CC4B:CF2C:E124:BFA2

January 2021
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Vail, Colorado, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Some1 (talk) 07:11, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vail, Colorado. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''I see no reason to go against Template:Weather box and change the snow color to green. Please discuss this change at the article's talk page, Talk:Vail, Colorado, before enacting it.'' palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 07:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * As a note, Wikipedia has a style guide (see WP:MOS) that is used to try to maintain a consistent style across the encyclopedia. Although I'm not sure changing the colors in the climate box goes against any explicit rule in the style guide, I think an implicit rule of the style guide is that Wikipedia should have consistent formatting. Because Template:Weather box by default formats snow as blue-ish, we would therefore have to then change all the articles using that template to make green be consistent, so I think it's best to keep the color consistent by leaving that parameter alone. palindrome§ǝɯoɹpuᴉןɐd 07:22, 30 January 2021 (UTC)