User talk:2604:3D08:2D7E:6700:3072:2446:8D34:3A9B

September 2021
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Camilla d'Errico, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

Although one portion of your additions to the article was accompanied by a citation of a GoodReads page, Wikipedia's policies on source reliability requires that sources used be those that have a general reputation for reliability, editorial control, etc. For this reason, open forums, blogs, social networks, etc., on which anyone can post a review are not considered reliable, per WP:USERG. More than one discussion among Wikipedia editors on the Reliable Sources Noticeboard (here and here in particlar) have determined that GoodReads is a social networking site on which anyone can edit pages or post reviews, and is therefore not considered reliable.

Also, a somewhat more minor point: Content on Wikipedia must be written in a journalistic, formal tone, which means, among other things, that biographical subjects should usually not be referred to by their given name.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)