User talk:2604:3D09:381:5E00:C5E9:FA69:74D0:B051

I'm wondering what was the reasoning for removing the below information from this article. The information is factual and supported with references. Vaticanus Codex - Quality of Character The character quality of this manuscript is considered poor; the many careless scribal errors and later corrections by multiple early scribes has been thoroughly documented since the 19th century. Its Text is also at variance and very inconsistent with other generally accepted readings, such as those found in the Majority of extant Greek manuscripts, quotes from early Church fathers, early translations, Church Lectionaries, and other documented evidence. Its text is also more likely to present contradictory or "difficult" issues of exegesis. Even when compared with the other Alexandrian Text, such as the Sinaiticus, Dean Burgon wrote, that the "manuscripts closely resembling one another, yet standing apart in every page so seriously that it is easier to find two consecutive verses in which they differ than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree" - [Dean Burgon, The Traditional Text, p. 33-34]. The following scientific analysis (http://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SinVat_Galatians.pdf) speaks directly to the many variant readings that are found within the Egyptian texts and how that when they so often mutually disagree one or the other almost always supports the consistent textual readings that are found in the Traditional Church text or the Byzantine Text Type which has the overwhelmingly largest extant evidence to support its consistency, authenticity and earliest known readings. 2604:3D09:381:5E00:31E6:1BCC:411D:A365 (talk) 22:48, 24 May 2019 (UTC)todd.rosvold@shaw.ca