User talk:2604:3D09:6A85:6000:A462:F32B:6146:B268

January 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Amy Schneider, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. snood1205 18:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Consider your vocabulary: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/jan/2/media-ripped-crowning-trans-player-amy-schneider-t/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3d09:6a85:6000:a462:f32b:6146:b268 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Per the Reliable sources/Perennial sources the Washington Times is The Washington Times is a marginally reliable source for politics and science. Most editors agree that it is a partisan source. Some editors noted a history of publishing inaccurate or false information, of being slow to issue retractions or corrections, and of sometimes only doing so under the threat of legal action; also with the important note The Washington Times should generally not be used for contentious claims, especially about living persons. This is both a political piece and has contentious information about a living person, which would not make it appropriate for wikipedia as a WP:RS. Regardless, the opinion of the Washington Times in an article does not override MOS:GID. Please abide by these guidelines; they were set in place for a reason with lots of discussion and consensus. snood1205 13:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)