User talk:2604:6000:B480:7800:31E1:2E8F:B969:A85C

Senkaku/Diaoyu claims
"Japan asserts this move was taken independently of the treaty ending the war, and China asserts that they were implied as part of the cession of Taiwan."

Shouldn't it be the opposite, with Japan claiming the annexation was legal while China making it an independent move?