User talk:2604:CA00:148:847F:0:0:64:27FC

I'm new to this so don't know how to reply to the person continually deleting the updates to content. Forgive me.

December 2021
Hello, I'm My Pants Metal. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Marcia G. Ory, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! My Pants Metal (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Marcia G. Ory. Thank you. My Pants Metal (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

removing my edits when best source was noted
What occurs is not subject to the same sort of investigation and reporting standards of many fields. when something happens within a university and the event involves investigation if high-level faculty, there will only be so many ways available to cite sources during that time.

Reporting the person and events involved factually and in as much detail as can be provided is not controversial. Absolutely nothing added was biased or misleading and stated as factually as possible. Please instead include the edits but instead include a disclaimer asking for additional sources or potentially questionable content.

By removing it entirely even when it is factual, you are allowing and aiding a university burying embezzled funds involving multiple millions of dollars of taxpayer funded grants by high-level faculty and staff. It should be included so that the university (and named faculty) can answer any questions people have related to the factual statements included. Transparency is crucial. if naming the Dean even can't constitute a legitimate enough source to at least leave it with a disclaimer about needing better sourced, you're adding to the likelihood the university buries this story and those millions of funds are never recovered from a woman that's a straight up billionaire. this is the best source available. It isn't controversial. it's factual the university isn't going to put out a news bulletin that their highly awarded faculty member is being investigated and others fired under her related to embezzlement. There is only so good a source as one could get. But she was removed as center director on the website and dean put in charge. That's as close as you're going to get for proof as a university buries the events. What else do you want or expect possible in this? 2604:CA00:148:847F:0:0:64:27FC (talk) 02:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)