User talk:2605:59C8:2107:6510:C01:8F68:5BFB:A289

March 2024
Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you recently removed content from Maria Bartiromo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '''If you believe that large amounts of the article shouldn't be there, you should start a discussion on the talk page of the article. Removing so much sourced content without discussion looks like vandalism.''' Joyous! Noise! 15:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * This is not vandalism. It's removing highly biased -- nonobjective -- political content that has no place on an information platform like Wikipedia. I will continue. Please stop promoting garbage content for political purposes. 2605:59C8:2107:6510:C01:8F68:5BFB:A289 (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Maria Bartiromo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 16:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Again, I am removing highly biased -- nonobjective -- political content that has no place on an information platform like Wikipedia. I will continue. Your continued removals are not constructive and vandalize this Wikipedia page. Please stop this vandalization. 2605:59C8:2107:6510:C01:8F68:5BFB:A289 (talk) 16:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi 2605:59C8:2107:6510:C01:8F68:5BFB:A289! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Maria Bartiromo several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ASUKITE 17:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Tommi1986 let's talk! 17:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I will repeat! I have removed highly biased -- nonobjective -- political content that has no place on an information platform like Wikipedia. Insisting that my corrections are vandalizing is inappropriate and itself vandalizing. I will continue to make these corrections despite your threats to block, which will not work. 2605:59C8:2107:6510:C01:8F68:5BFB:A289 (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You've already been reported, and you will be blocked. If you choose to jump IP's, they will be blocked, and eventually the article itself will end up protected. If you really think this is worth removing, discuss it on the talk page. That is how things get done here. ASUKITE  17:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Maria Bartiromo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 17:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Amortias (T)(C) 17:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.