User talk:2605:6000:6406:5A00:E4F5:96C7:A364:B4E0

BLP vios
Claims of last name require WP:RS citing, per WP:BLP. I've been adding RS cites. If you take them away again, I'm contacting an admin over BLP vios. --65.78.8.103 (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Contact an admin, I'll happily fight over it. 2605:6000:6406:5A00:E4F5:96C7:A364:B4E0 (talk) 17:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You're removing RS citations and adding BLP vios. Why are you removing RS citations? And you think an admin will like that you're removing RS cites? --65.78.8.103 (talk) 17:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * They're not gonna like that you're vandalizing page and removing last names after YEARS of having them is vandalizing.
 * The names are uncited. Who knows if they're true? That's why we cite.--65.78.8.103 (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You don't need a citation for every single name. This has never been done before, so doing it now is a moot point. Who said you could do this? Were you authorized by an admin to do this or are you doing this of your own accord?
 * According to both WP:VERIFY and more important WP:BLP, any personal-life claims about a living person MUST be WP:RS-cited. I've asked you to look up that core policy of BLP. Instead, you have edit-warred and gone over 3RR. I am reporting this to the 3RR page. --65.78.8.103 (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'll be here then. But you're going to eventually lose this battle because if it's not going to be me, it's going to be other people who are going to complain about these edits that no one asked for.

It doesn't matter if they "asked" for them. The policy of BLP requires that uncited personal-life claims be removed. Please read that policy.--65.78.8.103 (talk) 18:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * You literally did not have to do any of these edits. Everything was perfectly fine but you're doing this because of an asinine rule that's not even wholly followed. You're being a dictator. There was nothing wrong with having the correct names for all the contestants until you came along and decided that you wanted to enforce a rule that didn't need to be here. Well fine -- I'll argue with whoever I need to, but these are the correct names of the people on the show and that is my stance.
 * How do you know they're the correct names? "I just know"? That's not how Wikipedia works. See, for example the cast list at The Bachelorette (season 14).--65.78.8.103 (talk) 18:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It's all over the Internet! If you want to cite the sources then, you a simple google search will tell you a full cast list with last names. I'm not going to do it for you, since you seem so content on citing sources yourself. But removing their last names without any foundation is VANDALIZING!
 * First, whoever adds a claim is responsible for citing it. Second, "all over the Internet"? You believe anything you see on the Internet? Fan sites, wikia and a plethora of other websites are not WP:RS. And finally, WP:BLP specifically says that uncited personal-life claims are to be removed. You haven't even read that policy, clearly, so how are you qualified to speak about it? --65.78.8.103 (talk) 19:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * But these are their actual names. Deleting them because of an asinine rule is just being willfully ignorant. It's insane how stubborn you are about this. You're not upholding a rule, you're just being intentionally dumb. It's baffling to me how you cannot see that.
 * You didn't answer my question: How do you know these are the correct names? How do you know every one of these is spelled correctly, including the Turkish guy's? Where do these names come from? "The Internet"? Fan sites and wikia aren't WP:RS, and if you go a Google search on these names, fan sites and wikia are the majority of what turns up. And you certainly don't have the right to remove WP:RS citations. --65.78.8.103 (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Now that you can see the many footnotes I've added, and how the process works, I ask you not to add WP:BLP vios and instead to help find WP:RS citations. I ask you not to edit-war again when your block expires, since admins tend to institute longer blocks the more times one edit-wars. I'd prefer we work together collaboratively to find and add footnotes. --65.78.8.103 (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I would also note that an admin reverted your edits here, which is another indicator that removing RS cites and adding BLP vios was not appropriate. --65.78.8.103 (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't even care anymore, just do what you want2605:6000:6406:5A00:E4F5:96C7:A364:B4E0 (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 65.78.8.103 (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 65.78.8.103 (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as done at The Challenge: War of the Worlds 2. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 19:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.