User talk:2605:A000:1301:8733:D000:E939:D3FB:958A

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to John Rolfe. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:617F:E9A7:AF1C:4546 (talk) 23:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to Oculus Rift
Hi, | I undid your recent edit to Oculus Rift because:
 * 1. It is not specific enough to be verifiable.
 * You referred to a whole book, and it is unrealistic to expect anyone to be able to read the whole book to validate the statement. Wikipedia is supposed to be verifiable. Book citations should contain references to exact pages (for the reader to be able to find the source) and ISBN (in case the same book appeared in multiple editions with different page numbering).
 * 2. It seems like original research presented in a primary source, while Wikipedia prefers reliable secondary sources.

Please feel free to add this statement back into the article if you find the appropriate citation.

Best regards, Anton.bersh (talk) 21:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)