User talk:2605:A601:7013:4100:88:C934:5AE5:AAB0

May 2018
Hello, I'm ZfJames. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nick Studio 10 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — zfJames Please&thinsp;add  &thinsp;to&thinsp;your&thinsp;reply (talk&thinsp;page,&thinsp;contribs) 15:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Studio 10, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — zfJames Please&thinsp;add  &thinsp;to&thinsp;your&thinsp;reply (talk&thinsp;page,&thinsp;contribs) 15:20, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Nick Studio 10 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — zfJames Please&thinsp;add  &thinsp;to&thinsp;your&thinsp;reply (talk&thinsp;page,&thinsp;contribs) 15:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nick Studio
I understand that you have concerns about the content, but having a bias against information presented is not a sufficient reason to delete it. — zfJames Please&thinsp;add  &thinsp;to&thinsp;your&thinsp;reply (talk&thinsp;page,&thinsp;contribs) 15:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

You did the right thing; I've further cited to Zf policies as to why their edits should remain removed. Thank you for your diligence.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:07, 30 May 2018 (UTC)