User talk:2605:E000:1201:8EEC:4878:B2AF:5CB8:1BBA

David Ryu
Hi there. I recently removed your edit on the article David Ryu since it did not seem to meet Wikipedia standards on writing with a neutral point of view. The "Lead" section of an article (the first section, before the table of contents) is meant to summarize the rest of the article. The Wiki Manual of Style for a lead section (see WP:LEAD) says, "Do not violate WP:Neutral point of view by giving undue attention to less important controversies in the lead section." A charge that did not go to court and that is written about as two sentences in the article probably should not be in the lead of that article. If there was a lot of coverage of that controversy (especially if compared to other coverage of Ryu), then it should probably have a place in the lead, but more sources should be cited if that is the case. - Whisperjanes (talk) 20:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)