User talk:2605:E000:160B:C44A:D10E:343B:8D99:A50

On the top of the article it says

"This article reads like a press release or a news article and is largely based on routine coverage or sensationalism. Please expand this article with properly sourced content to meet Wikipedia's quality standards, event notability guideline, or encyclopedic content policy. (August 2020)".

It read the article and find it perfectly adequate. If the criticism above still stands, I would like to see which examples of the article are considered to be "routine coverage", "sensationalism", or not "properly sourced". I'd be happy to help, but, as I said, I find this article just fine.