User talk:2605:E000:A44D:9200:913B:4FF1:5593:ECFF

Note on citing unreliable sources
Thanks for contributing to the article Poway synagogue shooting. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Or you can look at WP:RSP, which notes specifically that Heavy.com is not a reliable source for serious or contentious claims. Bakazaka (talk) 01:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring
Your recent editing history at Poway synagogue shooting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bakazaka (talk) 02:40, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, I know that I will be careful next time when dealing with events such as Poway but the information I just posted comes from the articles. 03:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
 * At least so far, none of the articles in reliable sources say that Earnest posted the letter. They say that someone claiming to be Earnest posted the letter. Claiming otherwise is a violation of our policy on biographies of living persons, especially for people involved in crime investigations. Continuing to insert that claim into other articles, as you did at Open letter, is highly likely to get you blocked. So if you want to keep editing, be careful to say what the sources actually say. Bakazaka (talk) 03:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bakazaka (talk) 05:27, 28 April 2019 (UTC)