User talk:2606:6000:6942:2D00:BD7D:74A:BA6:DBCE

The review of this film is incredibly biased. For example:

It is labeled as 'propaganda'. Google unfairly labeled the film as such.. and removed this classification shortly after release. The characterization was so egregious that it resulted in one of the film's directors, Chuck Konzelman, testifying before a Senate Judiciary Investigative Committee (chaired by Sen. Ted Cruz) regarding suppression of conservative thought in April of 2019. Please delete this unfair characterization of our film.

The preferred nomenclature of "pro-life" should be observed, when referring to pro-lifers. Not anti-abortion. Unless, of course, you are willing to refer to pro-choice persons as "pro-abortion", on a consistent basis. Please adjust the language accordingly.

The Rotten Tomatoes 'negative' factor of only 42% of critics in favor is mentioned... but tellingly, the article omits mentioning the corresponding Rotten Tomatoes ranking showing that 92% of audience viewers had a favorable rating.

Please see the below quote:

The factually inaccurate[11][8][12] and heavily politicised[13] film was theatrically released in the United States by conservative Christian production and distibution house Pure Flix on March 29, 2019.

Why are no opposing views cited? A number of sources consider the film factually accurate. In fact, the film had a real-life board certified OB/GYN who formerly specialized in 2nd trimester abortions as its consultant, and playing the part of the surgeon in the key scene objected to by pro-choice activists. Why are no opposing viewpoints cited?

Please review our article with the above in mind, and adjust accordingly.

In the event that Wikipedia chooses not to do so, despite this notice, we will be compelled consider it yet another attempt by mainstream media to slight this film.

Hopeful if not optimistic, I shall remain...

Yours truly,

Chuck Konzelman