User talk:2607:F0D0:2002:69:0:0:0:20

Welcome!
Hello, 2607:F0D0:2002:69:0:0:0:20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac 16888 Talk 17:26, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Are you sure you aren't the blocked user solely interested in Code2000? George Ho (talk) 17:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * What user? I have IPV6, not those IPV4s. Just came in and was abused for nothing. I only wanted to have legit link from unblock request put in article. Prove me where my link is forgery, hoax, etc?

To administrators: I did request the external link on that guy's behalf, but the other guy blocked him as the sockpuppet of the blocked user. George Ho (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * It is double standard-I cannot show admin misuses while you can accuse me for unrelated IP edits?

Then prove that you are not a sockpuppet of the blocked user. I've already reported you at WP:ANI. George Ho (talk) 18:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't get a damn even what he is nicked! And your reports only show hostile atmosphere here. Better stop call this "Free Encyclopedia", since there are espionages, denunciations, etc... instead of WIKILOVE. Additionally, sockpuppets are promoting hoax SourceForge warez forgery, while I show LEGIT FontSpace mirror.

All right, let's not this into either a forum or a free-speech circus then. I don't know which you are interested in, but seems to me that you have been recently uncooperative. Look, just take a break for 24 hours and then come back. George Ho (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. Note that you too was not so cooperative with me. Remember your 31.170.166.23 misreports?

What "misreport"? There are enough traces in my usertalk page's history log to prove that you are the other IP user, such as re-adding the "request", denied by the administrator. George Ho (talk) 18:21, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * It is merely coincidence. It is shame that Wikipedia disallows non-hoax links here. Think about readers-they do not know where to download legit Code2000 copy.

Perhaps read WP:external links there. George Ho (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * But THIS link is NOT hoax from Sourceforge banned here according to Code2000 talk. It is ZIPFILE section mirror of defunct CODE2000 link to Wayback, already being here. It merely eases ZIPFILE downloads since Wayback file retrieving is too cumbersome.
 * How do you know ? Look, admit your past user accounts if you registered before, so we can settle matters before things could go worse for you. George Ho (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC) too late: your talk privileges are inaccessible right now. George Ho (talk) 18:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
 * George, I think you were called a "detainator", but I'm not entirely sure what kind of insult that is. Leave the discussion for the ANI thread; no need to dance around on this talk page now. Drmies (talk) 18:45, 9 November 2013 (UTC)