User talk:2607:FB91:100B:2D6C:84D3:617C:5031:C149

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions to Cedar Fair&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

The information I restored in the Cedar Fair article is not incorrect as you state. It is, however, not pretinent to the Cedar Fair article, so I'm not going to bother reinserting it or referencing it. Those same statements, which are correct, are already referenced in the Cedar Point article. I recommend you read the links above, get yourself familiar with wikipedia, and don't be so abrasive. That type of attitude will not serve you well here. Happy editing.— JlACEer ( talk ) 04:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

@JlACEer
JlAcer: I hope you don't object that I am pasting your elsewhere comments, to this thread, so that those comments remain with this Article. ""The information I restored in the Cedar Fair article is not incorrect as you state. It is, however, not pertinent to the Cedar Fair article, so I'm not going to bother reinserting it or referencing it. Those same statements, which are correct, are already referenced in the Cedar Point article. I recommend you read the links above, get yourself familiar with Wikipedia, and don't be so abrasive. That type of attitude will not serve you well here. Happy editing.—JlACEer (talk) 04:53, 3 December 2021""
 * Actually some portions of the removed text, were very pertinent to the Article, if, and I stress the word IF, they had been accurately stated. But they were not accurately stated, which is why I had posted the corrected information, and included my source references within the reason for the edit, because, as you stated, those source references were already within the CP article itself, so, based upon your own assertions, it was not necessary for me to add those pre-existing refs. However, you deleted my corrections anyway, under the sole premise that I was an "IP vandal", and afterward you separately accused me of also being intentionally abrasive. I have no idea what you meant that my referenced information was abrasive, or unless perhaps you were referring to my reason for my updated edit. In which case, I would have to now say that my reasoning in regard to my updated edit, was right on target. 2607:FB91:100B:2D6C:84D3:617C:5031:C149 (talk) 17:26, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I was referring to your summary comments, quote: " No need for me to include refs from David Francis book and Hildebrandt book and etc.etc.etc. because the paid contributors here will revert it back to the total nonsense and the no-ref way it was before, anyway." Seems abrasive to me. It also makes it look like the work of an IP vandal, thus my hasty reversal. The article in question is about Cedar Fair, which was formed decades after the first enterprises on the peninsula started. The exact date that those started — which most published experts believe to be 1870 — is not really important to this article.— JlACEer ( talk ) 18:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

JlAcer: please don't post anything else to my talk page. However you are free to respond on the Cedar Fair talk page. Thank you. P.s.2022: @JlACEer, Actually I changed my mind. It's only fair if I let you post anything you wish onto my talk pages. Considering all of the personal data about you that I have plastered onto so many user pages on Wikipedia and etcetera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB91:1082:E0:CC1:AC93:7640:A804 (talk) 01:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

ANI discussion notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 21:16, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.
 * You admitted that you knew that the misconduct you were planning was a blockable offense, and you went ahead and did it anyway. Please reconsider your approach to editing Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC)