User talk:2607:FB91:10AE:51F2:44A6:2253:48DC:38B6

July 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generaliation, other talk pages such as Talk:Cedar Point are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Cedar Point for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 14:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I see you are having trouble understanding the difference between discussing an improvement and asking a general question. On the talk page you keep posting to, you are asking a general question about the subject. Wikipedia article talk pages are not help desks meant to help with understanding something related to the subject. If you have something you'd like to insert into the article, then feel free to discuss that citing sources that support the claim. However, you should be using the reference desk or Teahouse for anything else. --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Because you have been bludgeoning Talk:Cedar Point with posts that violate WP:NOTAFORUM after having been warned, you have been blocked for a month from editing that talk page. When your block expires, limit yourself to productive, actionable discussion of specific article improvements. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * , unfortunately this editor has resumed with unconstructive commentary and feedback at that article talk page, going as far as casting aspersions with these comments (note the anon editor's new IP in the same range). --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , I do not think those comments call for a block . . . yet. Ping me if things deteriorate. Cullen328 (talk) 18:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , thanks for your patience with this editor. I've tried to be patient as well, but it appears they remain committed to a battleground mentality that keeps spilling over into disparaging remarks.
 * See diff1 and diff2, as well as diff3 and diff4 on another editor's talk page.
 * Despite my best efforts to keep it focused on content, they take every opportunity to make it personal. Maybe not enough for a block, but perhaps a final stern warning would help at this point. Whatever you think is needed, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , I have blocked the current IP address for 72 hours. Let me know if the disruption resumes. Cullen328 (talk) 18:34, 7 August 2023 (UTC)