User talk:2607:FCC8:9447:CC00:F44B:CADA:FFA4:51E5

The title of the Article should not be Hippolytus of Rome but simply Hippolytus. Controversy has surrounded the identity and provenance of the author Hippolytus of the second-third century. To assume Rome as a provenance dismisses the work of top scholars and historians working in the field of patristics, some of whom advocate Anatolia, Egypt and other regions of the mideast as the community of the writer. Please refer to the work of Loi, Simonetti, Nautin, Brent, Cerrato, as well as The Oxford Dictionary of Late Antiquity (Hippolytus) and The Dictionary of Major Biblical Interpreters (Hippolytus). The assignment of this writer to Rome has been weighed and found wanting. To refer to him as Hippolytus of Rome ignores over 100 years of research and forwards a theory of identity created in the Victorian age on little evidence. Other elements of the article also bear improvement.