User talk:2607:FEA8:1DE0:274:A977:7A6D:E85B:5DBA

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. El_C 01:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Please try to keep your composure. Now what is it I could do for you? El_C 01:42, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Be careful using rollback, make only constructive edits or don't edit 2607:FEA8:1DE0:274:A977:7A6D:E85B:5DBA (talk) 01:43, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It was vandalism, from the outset. I was just getting to it, then I did. El_C 01:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

--- There are plenty of sources about their philanthropy, please pay attention and/or stop disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. El_C 01:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.